@stopmakingthatbigface find the worst of both worlds in teaching yourself emacs lisp or vimscript and start coding by immersing yourself in IDE discourse
@oct2pus Profitable? Definite no. Sustainable? maybe in the context of virtually free energy and money, both of which are fundamentally unsustainable in their own rightβ¦
Definitely the saddest/most off-putting part of that post to me was the admonition that they kinda could still make this work, assuming they were able to sextuple their user count. Especially coming from a culture that I always found to be more adverse to the notion of infinite growth.
Fediverse-style small, interconnected communities seems to be the answer, and I feel like in spite of the challenges over the years, we have repeatedly demonstrated that, and god damn it really feels like nobody wants to hear us out lol. Not even many notable instance admins these days
Even if you never read "The Dawn of Everything" by Davids Graeber and Wengrow, at least take this to heart:
What you learned about human prehistory was most likely a lie. There was no linear progression from hunter/gatherer to farmer to city dweller to modern human. Our ancient ancestors were just as creative as we are. They didn't wait until 5,000 years ago to figure out agriculture. They invented it and discarded it when it didn't suit them, over and over again. They built cities and abandoned them quickly or centuries later, over and over again. They invented and discarded socialism and despotism, many times over. And there's no correlation between mode of production vs. political freedom. The idea of a linear progression was invented by 18th century Europeans who were feeling defensive about the inequality in their societies as compared to those of indigenous Americans.