Conversation

any good VPN recommendations? (UK online safety act)
boosts appreciated

2
1
0

@bunnybeam otherwise….sigh

proton if you can get over their CEO being a trump bootlicker

2
0
0
@alexia @bunnybeam apparently his bootlickery-ness is a bit overstated
1
0
1

@shroomie @bunnybeam idk going onto twitter and saying how great trump is for enacting random shit on the economy sounds like bootlicking to me

1
0
2
@alexia @bunnybeam i mean i don't really keep track of things tbh. you seem to know a lot more than i do lol
0
0
1

@alexia is proton actually any good? presumably there’s data selling going on, if it’s a free VPN

2
0
0

@bunnybeam

They’re one of the few that are known not to do that

2
0
0

@bunnybeam oh and yeah proton is fine in terms of like, actual quality of service

just y’know if ya got five bucks to spare, Mullvad is gonna be better :P

0
0
0

@bunnybeam @alexia hmm, it says it doesn’t allow torrenting <small>(not the usecase here)</small> and “streaming” <small>(unclear what they mean)</small>

1
0
0

@green @bunnybeam I do not know what they mean by ‘streaming’ either <small>(must be a recent addition, never saw that)</small> but yeah they do not have port-forwarding so torrenting is not really an option over Proton

2
0
0

@green @bunnybeam oh also their windows client literally turns itself off when BitTorrent is detected lmfao

0
0
0

@bunnybeam @alexia also, do we think the uk online safety act is just gonna ban every small fedi instance and matrix server?

1
0
0

@green @bunnybeam

There are several fedi instances that have already shut down.

2
0
0

@green @bunnybeam I also don’t understand why people only now begin to worry about it, the OSA/OSB has been a thing for like 2 years

0
0
0

@bunnybeam they subsidize their free users from those who pay and B2B sales (Yes they have a lot of those, reportedly)

0
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@alexia @green but that’s because of the pressure, not because of any actual action, no? i think that’s different

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@bunnybeam @green

That is from the pressure of it starting to be enforced on larger players.

The thing with laws like this is that there’s usually a place to report stuff, and those will inevitably be used for abuse and harassment of whoever is running the instance

I also heard from many other instances that just geoblock the UK instead


I do also want to clarify that Matrix servers will probably be exempt when it comes to encrypted communications, because after being screamed at by like every single E2EE messaging app in existence they decided to “not enforce [the E2EE-breaking parts of the OSB] until it becomes technically feasible to do so”

of course it never will, because basically none of these projects will build intentional backdoors into their encryption, but this would also mean any E2EE matrix comms are exempt. Public unencrypted communications may not be though

And of course, I am not a lawyer, I am just a massive nerd when it comes to this kind of stuff

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@alexia @green doesn’t the OSA only apply “if the service you provide has a significant number of users in the UK, or if the UK is a target market”?
that shouldn’t apply for most (small) fedi instances, unless i’m misunderstanding
source: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/guide-for-services, see “Who the rules apply to”

2
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@bunnybeam @green went through the quiz on that very website which was linked

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@alexia @green i went through the quiz and got No, because i believe (in the cases of the instances that i use) the answer to the first question is “No”. what were your answers, if i may ask?

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@bunnybeam @green well I already closed the tab so I’d have to take it again….

2
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@green @bunnybeam it did say “unsure” only when I selected “don’t know” on the first question, and “no” when I selected, well, “no” on the first question

but with fedi it’s kinda difficult not to have something to do with the UK somewhere by design

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@alexia @green either way, i think the most important question is the first one, being whether or not the service “has links to the UK”
to which i believe the answer is “no”

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@bunnybeam @green I mean, still, lots of instances that just plain died were in the UK and that country is now no longer safe to host a fedi instance in at all, even if you just live there and the server sits somewhere else

like no matter how you spin it this is just bad and I can understand why many just plain left despite the fact they didn’t want to

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@alexia @green if you open up the “More information” box, it elaborates on what “links to the UK” means
specifically, as mentioned earlier, it means either:

  • it has the UK as a target market (which is not the case for non-profit instances)
  • or it has a significant number of users in the UK (which is not the case for smaller instances)
1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@bunnybeam @alexia it’s also unclear, if in case of fedi, users means

  1. your users
  2. randos visiting the unauthenticated web frontend
  3. all users of fedi

if it’s (3) then the act would be impossible to comply with. even an ip block wouldn’t do it. because even if you ip-block all uk users, you will still have users in the uk, who can see your content

1
0
1
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@green @bunnybeam yeah it just depends on whether “federating with every other server” is considered a part of your service that you’re responsible for or not, I guess

In the sense of, do they consider “fedi” as a whole or just individual servers

0
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@alexia i don’t think instances dying pre-emptively is indicative of actual risk on its own
i can totally understand people doing that as a precaution, particularly if their instance is large, but people’s reaction based on predictions doesn’t necessarily reflect what will actually happen

don’t get me wrong, i’m not arguing that the act isn’t terrible - it is - but with my limited funds, i’d like to avoid having to take precautions such as using a paid VPN if possible, so an accurate assessment is more helpful than a cautious one

1
0
0
discussion of the Online Safety Act, UKpol
Show content

@bunnybeam I honestly forgot this thing started with VPN recommendations

yeah my point stands, Proton is generally trusted you’re just gonna have like 3 countries total or whatever and the servers can get pretty full unless ya cash out which stinks

0
0
0

@bunnybeam

I’ve been using airvpn for 8 years

0
0
0