Conversation

having thought about it for 3.5 seconds now, my new scorchingest take is that Ballmer's Microsoft is underappreciated for having set down such a good technical foundation for Nadella's Microsoft to make every single available misstep and still be the market leader in almost all of their core segments

1
2
0

Is the surface of Windows 11 riddled with nearly every possible bad idea MS can have made for the vast majority of the people who need to actually put their eyeballs on it day in and day out?

Yes.

Is the core of the OS still actually pretty good? Also yes.

1
2
0
@coryw this seems patently absurd until one really thinks, in good faith and in all seriousness, about the problem of how *anything* is even capable of running *at all* that came out under Nadella
1
0
0
this is a microcosm of how, no matter how bad anything ever gets, i never *actually* seriously hold the position that the world was created by a malevolent capital-G God, or even a demiurge that was primarily motivated by evil desires

the evil we see in our lives proves over and over again nothing as complex as the ATP cycle, let alone consciousness or the laws of physics as a whole, can arise from that
2
0
0
did i just implicitly compare nadella to satan? yes

was it a fair comparison? no, not to satan
0
0
0

@apophis

I'm being a little un-nuanced for sure.

To Nadella's credit, Ballmer-era MS had some misses too, especially w/re Windows RT (and the half-executed vision of windows 8 entirely) and reallocating the MacBU team to mobile before Nadella finally returned them for 2016

And Nadella had a few wins, like the office shared core thing that happened at some point after office 2016.

B

0
0
1

@apophis sorry but you’re wrong. i don’t know fully what you’re talking about but i am god and i created humans so that they would eventually rise up and kill my enemies while i hide in the bushes in the background

0
0
1